10 profound questions atheists often ask about faith

Ever felt like you’re bringing a knife to a gunfight when discussing religion? It’s a feeling many believers know well lately, especially as the “nones” (religiously unaffiliated) have stabilized at around 28% of the U.S. population, according to data by Pew Research Center. The conversation around faith isn’t just about ancient texts anymore; it’s about logic, ethics, and hard evidence. I remember my first late-night college debate—I was woefully unprepared for the sheer precision of these arguments.

IMO, understanding these questions is crucial whether you’re a skeptic, a believer, or just curious.  Here are 10 profound questions atheists often ask about faith that stop conversations in their tracks.

Is there a teapot orbiting the sun?

This sounds ridiculous, but it’s a legendary philosophical curveball from Bertrand Russell. He asked us to imagine a teapot orbiting the sun, too small to be seen by telescopes. Since you can’t disprove it, does that mean we should believe it exists? Atheists use this to illustrate the burden of proof; it’s not their job to disprove God, but the believer’s job to prove Him.  

Christopher Hitchens sharpened this idea into what is now known as Hitchens’ Razor: “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. Essentially, if you claim a teapot (or a deity) exists without showing the goods, the skeptic can dismiss it without lifting a finger.  

Why is the gardener invisible?

Imagine two explorers find a clearing in the jungle with both flowers and weeds. One insists a gardener tends it; the other disagrees. They wait, watch, and use bloodhounds, but no gardener ever appears. The believer then claims the gardener is invisible, scentless, and intangible. The skeptic finally asks: “How does an invisible, intangible gardener differ from an imaginary gardener?”  

This parable by Antony Flew attacks the tendency to excuse God’s silence. Skeptics call this “death by a thousand qualifications.” When prayers aren’t answered, or miracles don’t happen, the definition of God gets watered down until He’s functionally the same as nothing at all.

Is god just a receding pocket of ignorance?

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson famously described the “God of the Gaps” argument as a losing battle. Historically, if we didn’t understand lightning, we called it Zeus; now we call it atmospheric physics. Tyson notes that if that’s how you define God, then He is merely “an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance”.  

This erosion of mystery is hitting hard. Recent Gallup data shows that biblical literalism in the U.S. has hit a record low of 20%. As science explains more of the universe, the “gaps” where God can comfortably reside are shrinking.  

What about bone cancer in children?

This is the heavy hitter. When asked what he would say to God, actor Stephen Fry didn’t mince words: “Bone cancer in children? What’s that about?” He argued that a God who created a world with insects specifically designed to burrow into children’s eyes is not a loving father, but a “maniac.”  

This isn’t just about “free will” (which explains human evil like war). This addresses gratuitous natural evil—suffering that humans neither caused nor can stop. For many, the existence of such specific, cruel biological designs makes the idea of a benevolent designer impossible to swallow.

Is god a moral monster?

You might expect atheists just to say God doesn’t exist, but many argue that the character described in the Old Testament is actually a villain. Richard Dawkins famously described this deity as a “vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser… [and] misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal… bully”.  

Skeptics point to specific scriptures to back this up:

• Genocide: Commands to kill entire nations, including infants.
• Slavery: Rules permitting the owning of humans as property.
• Misogyny: Laws forcing victims to marry their abusers.

Is it good because god loves it?

This is a classic brain-twister known as the Euthyphro Dilemma. It asks: Is something “good” because God commands it, or does God command it because it is good?.  

If you say “because God commands it,” then morality is arbitrary—God could command torture tomorrow, and it would be “good.” If you say “because it is good,” then God isn’t the source of morality; He’s just following a higher standard like the rest of us. It frames secular morality as potentially superior because it relies on empathy rather than obedience.

Is heaven a celestial North Korea?

Christopher Hitchens loved to compare the concept of heaven to a totalitarian state. He called it a “Celestial North Korea” where you are constantly surveilled, convicted of thought crimes, and forced to praise the leader for eternity. FYI, he argued that at least in North Korea, you can die to escape.  

This critique of “compulsory love” resonates with modern Americans who value autonomy. Perhaps that’s why belief in Hell has dropped to 59%, according to the 2023 Gallup Poll, significantly lower than belief in God. People are rejecting the “stick” part of the carrot-and-stick approach.  

If god sees the future, do you have a choice?

Here’s a logic puzzle: If God is all-knowing (omniscient), He knows precisely what you will eat for breakfast ten years from now. Since God cannot be wrong, you cannot choose to eat anything else. So, do you actually have free will?.  

Atheists liken this to a movie reel: the characters on screen seem to be making choices, but the film is already in the can. If the script is written, how can God justly punish Judas for betraying Jesus, or an atheist for disbelieving, if they were destined to do so before they were born?

Why does your zip code determine your truth?

Sam Harris often points out that there is no such thing as “Christian physics” or “Muslim algebra,” yet morality and truth are treated as geographically relative. If you were born in Arkansas, you’re likely Christian; born in Mumbai, likely Hindu.  

This suggests that faith is primarily a result of cultural indoctrination rather than objective discovery. If a divine truth were universal, wouldn’t it look the same everywhere, regardless of where your parents raised you?

Why doesn’t god heal amputees?

Believers often credit God with healing invisible ailments, such as back pain, or with remission from cancer. But atheists ask a simple, brutal question: Why does God never regenerate a lost limb?. Salamanders can do it, but prayer never seems to work for this specific, undeniable miracle.  

When we test prayer scientifically, the results can be awkward. The massive STEP study (Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer) showed that heart patients who knew they were being prayed for actually had more complications (59% vs 52%) than those who didn’t know. It suggests that prayer might be little more than the placebo effect—or worse, performance anxiety.  

Key Takeaway

The debate has moved far beyond simple scripture quoting. Today’s skeptics are armed with philosophical razors, sociological data, and moral challenges that demand serious intellectual engagement. Whether you agree with them or not, these questions force us to really examine why we believe what we believe—and that’s a good thing, right?

Read the Original Article on Crafting Your Home