Self-talk is broader than talking out loud.
Researchers don’t limit self-talk to the words people audibly say to themselves. The term can also include silent inner speech.
That distinction matters.
Saying “keys” while searching a cluttered counter is not the same mental activity as silently rehearsing what you plan to say in an upcoming conversation.
Different studies examine different kinds of self-talk, so findings from one type shouldn’t automatically be applied to every other form.
In other words, science doesn’t support one sweeping conclusion that “talking to yourself is good.” The picture is much more interesting than that.
Related: 9 Rare Personality Traits of People Who Replay Conversations in Their Head
It happens in certain everyday situations.
A 2025 study gives researchers a closer look at how people use self-talk during daily life.
The study followed 208 participants who completed 12,966 surveys over two weeks. Researchers focused on four specific situations: criticizing oneself, preparing what to say or do, trying to feel better, and feeling pleased with oneself.
Across those situations, participants reported first-person self-talk, using language such as “I” or “me,” 43.2% of the time. They used more distanced forms of self-talk, such as addressing themselves as “you” or by name, in 14.5% of situations. No self-talk was reported in 42.3% of situations.
Those numbers don’t mean people spend nearly half their entire day chatting internally or aloud. They apply only to the particular situations researchers asked about.
Still, they show that self-directed language can be a regular part of how people respond to everyday moments.
Saying what you’re searching for may actually help.
One of the most practical findings comes from experiments by researchers Gary Lupyan and Daniel Swingley.
Participants searching for familiar objects sometimes performed better when they said the object’s name aloud. So if you’re rummaging through a crowded drawer looking for your keys, saying “keys” may be more useful than it sounds.
But there’s an important catch.
The benefit was strongest when the spoken label closely matched what participants expected the object to look like. When the word and the visual target were a poor match, speaking could actually make the search less effective.
So the research doesn’t suggest narrating every household search like you’re hosting your own reality show. It suggests that under certain conditions, saying the name of a familiar object may sharpen the search.
Talking through a task may have practical value.
Self-talk has also been studied in performance settings.
A meta-analysis covering 32 studies of self-talk interventions in sports found a moderate positive effect on task performance, with an effect size of 0.48.
Results varied by task, and interventions that included self-talk training produced stronger results than those that did not.
That finding offers a useful everyday parallel.
When you’re learning something unfamiliar- assembling furniture, organizing a complicated project, or working through a sequence of steps- verbally guiding yourself through the process may serve a purpose.
But the research does not prove that people who casually talk to themselves are automatically more productive. Structured self-talk for a particular task differs from simply speaking your thoughts aloud throughout the day.
Using your own name may change your perspective.
Here’s where self-talk becomes even more surprising.
In two laboratory experiments, researchers asked participants to reflect silently using either first-person language such as “I” or their own name.
In one experiment involving negative memories, 50 participants reported less negative feelings when they reflected using their name. On a five-point scale, the average rating was 3.24 in the name condition compared with 3.82 in the first-person condition.
The idea is sometimes described as “distanced self-talk.” Instead of thinking, “What should I do next?” a person might silently ask, “What should Sarah do next?”
But context matters again.
The experiment involved a deliberately prompted technique under controlled conditions. It doesn’t establish that referring to yourself by name will automatically change how you feel in everyday life.
Daily life results are more modest.
The 2025 daily-life study adds another useful dose of realism.
Researchers found that distanced self-talk was associated with a small improvement in later positive feelings when participants were preparing what to say or do.
However, the same pattern did not appear across the other three situations researchers examined.
Because participants weren’t randomly assigned a style of self-talk, the study cannot show that distanced self-talk directly caused the change.
That’s an important distinction: laboratory techniques may show promising effects under specific conditions, while real-world results can be narrower
Children may use self-talk to guide themselves, too.
Self-directed speech isn’t limited to adults.
In a longitudinal study involving 160 children, researchers observed how 3-year-olds talked to themselves while completing a difficult puzzle.
Speech meaningfully connected to the task was later associated with better inhibitory control at age 4, particularly among children whose mothers reported higher anger reactivity.
The takeaway isn’t that children who talk more are smarter or better at controlling themselves.
Instead, the finding suggests that the content of a child’s self-directed speech may matter. Talking through the actual problem seems different from simply making more noise.
Self-talk doesn’t reveal a personality type.
Talking to yourself also doesn’t provide an easy shortcut for figuring out someone’s personality.
In the 2025 study, researchers found no significant relationship between how often participants used first-person or distanced self-talk and the study’s measures of narcissism or general emotional distress.
So hearing someone say, “Come on, Mike, you’ve got this,” isn’t evidence that they’re unusually self-absorbed.
Research on performance also resists simple labels. A review of 47 studies found benefits linked with positive, instructional, and motivational self-talk, but negative self-talk did not consistently hurt performance.
Once again, context wins.
One-line takeaway: Talking to yourself isn’t remarkable on its own; the research suggests the words you use, the task you’re facing, and the moment you use them matter far more.
Other Posts You Might Like
- The Things Intelligent People Refuse to Believe Aren’t Always What You Think
- 8 Subtle Indicators You Possess a Stronger Personality Than Most
If you like what you just read, then subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on social media.
