Science

Science Confirms Teenagers Smell Worse Than Babies and 7 Other Delightfully Odd Ig Nobel Winners

Houston Taabu
By Houston Taabu 6 min read

The post Science Confirms Teenagers Smell Worse Than Babies and 7 Other Delightfully Odd Ig Nobel Winners first appeared on Crafting Your Home.

 

If you have ever wondered why a baby’s smell can seem irresistible while a teenager’s bedroom can tell a very different story, scientists have now given parents something to talk about.

Researchers studying how parents perceive their children’s body odors won the 2026 Ig Nobel Prize in Olfaction for finding evidence that babies smell wonderful to their parents, while teenagers generally do not. The prize was awarded to Ilona Croy, Tomasz Frackowiak, Thomas Hummel and Agnieszka Sorokowska at the Ig Nobel ceremony in Zurich on September 3.

The research behind the prize is not actually new. The original study was published in 2017, after 255 mothers and fathers rated the body odor of their children and, for comparison, their partners. Follow-up research later examined odor samples from more than 300 children and included brain-imaging work.

The researchers found that parents tended to rate the smell of babies and younger children particularly positively. That preference changed around puberty, when parents became less likely to find their children’s body odor pleasant.

So yes, scientific evidence backs up the familiar parental complaint.

But the smell of teenagers was only one of the wonderfully strange subjects recognized at this year’s Ig Nobel Prizes.

Scientists finally defined what counts as a kiss.

Group of smiling teenagers walking in a sunny forest path during summer.
Image Credit: Ron Lach/Pexels

The Ig Nobel Prize in Biomechanics went to Matilda Brindle, Catherine Talbot and Stuart West for developing a more precise scientific definition of kissing.

Their definition describes kissing as directed mouth-to-mouth contact without food transfer. The researchers also examined kissing-like behavior across species, including ants, birds, polar bears and humans.

It sounds obvious until scientists start asking exactly what qualifies as a kiss.

Their work also explored when kissing-like behavior may have emerged in primate evolution.

Someone studied how to blow your nose.

The Medicine Prize went posthumously to Japanese researcher Tokuji Unno for a 1977 study titled How to Blow the Nose: An Aerodynamic Study of the Nose Blowing.

The research examined the mechanics of blowing one’s nose and even considered differences in how the practice was approached in Japan and Europe.

It may sound like an unusually specific research question, but that is precisely the kind of everyday behavior the Ig Nobels are famous for highlighting.

A splash-free urinal became a physics problem.

The Physics Prize recognized Randy Hurd, Zhao Pan, Tadd Truscott and Kaveeshan Thurairajah for theoretical and experimental work aimed at designing a urinal that produces less splash.

Their research examined the angle at which a stream hits a surface and how a urinal’s shape can reduce unwanted splashing.

It is a perfect example of the Ig Nobel philosophy: take something ordinary, ask a surprisingly specific question about it, and then apply serious science.

Mosquito mouthparts became 3D-printing equipment.

The Technology Prize went to a team that explored an extremely unusual material for 3D printing.

The researchers used mosquito proboscises, the insects’ specialized mouthparts, as high-resolution 3D-printing nozzles in a process called necroprinting.

The work demonstrates how researchers can find unexpected engineering possibilities in biological structures.
It also gives an entirely new meaning to the phrase “thinking outside the box.”

Researchers buried 1,000 pairs of underwear.

The Soil Science Prize went to researchers who buried 1,000 pairs of identical cotton underwear in more than 25 countries and dug them up two months later.

The goal wasn’t simply to see what happened to old underwear underground.

The researchers investigated whether decomposing cotton underwear could provide information about soil activity and conditions.

The project involved citizen scientists in numerous countries, turning an unusual experiment into a large international research effort.

Scientists investigated what makes venomous snakes bite.

The Biology Prize recognized researchers who investigated the defensive behavior of venomous snakes.

The team studied whether different parts of a snake’s body, different temperatures, and different times of day affected the likelihood of a defensive bite. The study involved repeatedly applying carefully controlled pressure to different parts of snakes.

It is safe to say this is one experiment most people would rather read about than participate in.

Cockroach “milk” entered the scientific spotlight.

The Chemistry Prize recognized research into milk proteins produced by a species of cockroach that gives birth to live young.

The researchers found that the protein crystals associated with this cockroach’s milk contain about three times as much energy per unit mass as cow’s milk proteins.

That does not mean anyone should start adding cockroach milk to breakfast. The award recognized the scientific discovery itself, not a recommendation to consume it.

Researchers studied why people appreciate mean friends.

The Peace Prize went to Jaimie Arona Krems, Rebecka Hahnel-Peeters, Laureon Merrie, Keelah Williams and Daniel Sznycer.

Their research examined people’s preferences for friends who behave aggressively or unpleasantly toward people the friend and participant both dislike.

In other words, the study explored an awkward social reality: sometimes people may appreciate a friend who is especially unpleasant to someone they themselves dislike.

That is certainly more complicated than the traditional idea that a good friend is simply a nice person.

What makes the Ig Nobels different?

The Ig Nobel Prizes celebrate research that first makes people laugh and then makes them think. They are not intended to suggest that the research is worthless or that the scientists are not serious.

The 2026 winners covered everything from human relationships and parenting to engineering, biology, soil science and physics.

And perhaps that is the real appeal.
Science does not always begin with a grand question about curing a disease, exploring space, or solving climate change. Sometimes it begins with something much smaller:

Why does my baby smell so good?

Why does my teenager smell different?

Why does a urinal splash?

How exactly should you blow your nose?
Can underwear tell us something about soil?

Those questions may sound ridiculous at first. But the Ig Nobels show that curiosity does not always arrive wearing a lab coat and carrying an obvious question.

Sometimes, it starts with something that makes you laugh.

And for parents everywhere, it may also provide a scientifically backed explanation for why the baby smell disappears when puberty arrives.

 

Other Posts You Might Like

If you like what you just read, then subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on social media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *