Curiosity as a Love Language

The post Curiosity as a Love Language first appeared on Crafting Your Home.

Decades of relationship science point to a specific behavior that predicts closeness more reliably than charm or shared hobbies: asking real questions and caring about the answers.

In 1997, psychologist Arthur Aron and his colleagues published a paper in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin with an unglamorous title, The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness. Inside was a procedure that would outlive its academic footnotes. Two strangers sat across from each other and worked through 36 questions over roughly 45 minutes, moving from mild icebreakers toward memory, regret, and mortality.

Pairs who completed the escalating questions reported measurably greater closeness afterward than pairs assigned to comparable small talk, according to the published results. Aron built the exercise around his self-expansion model, the theory that people are drawn to partners who broaden their sense of who they are and what they know. In that framing, curiosity is not a personality quirk.

It is the mechanism.

The list resurfaced in 2015, when writer Mandy Len Catron described trying it herself in The New York Times’ Modern Love column, prompting readers to search for the full question set. What got lost in the viral spread was the finding underneath it. Closeness didn’t come from the topics chosen; it came from sustained, escalating, reciprocal disclosure, one person asking, the other answering honestly, then returning the favor.

A separate body of research, led by Todd Kashdan at George Mason University, examined curiosity less as a conversational format and more as an individual trait.

In a study Kashdan conducted as a doctoral student at the University at Buffalo with Paul Rose and Frank Fincham, 90 students completed curiosity inventories before being paired for conversations ranging from small talk to deliberately intimate exchanges. Students who scored higher on trait curiosity formed closer connections with total strangers, and the effect held regardless of how attractive or socially anxious they otherwise felt, according to the researchers’ 2002 presentation of the findings.

Kashdan and his collaborators followed up nearly a decade later with a more rigorous set of experiments, published in the Journal of Personality in 2011 under the title When Curiosity Breeds Intimacy. Across three studies involving nearly 300 college students, curious participants underestimated how well they would connect with strangers during ordinary conversation, then went on to feel close to their partners anyway. Less curious participants only reported closeness when a conversation was deliberately structured to build it, meaning they needed a script that curious people did not.

The distinction matters more than it first sounds. Kashdan has argued that showing interest in a partner matters more for a relationship’s survival than being interesting yourself, since questions are what start the back-and-forth disclosure self-expansion theory depends on. Ask, listen, get asked in return: the loop compounds, not any single charming answer.

One detail complicates the idea that curiosity is fixed at birth. Kashdan’s own framework separates trait curiosity, a relatively stable disposition, from state curiosity, the temporary spike of interest a specific moment can produce, and his research treats both as shaping outcomes. That leaves room for a less flattering possibility: incuriosity inside a long relationship may be a habit worn in over time rather than a fixed personality feature, which would make it a habit worth wearing back out.

Related Post: 8 Questions to Never Ask a Man When Dating Over 50

Psychologist John Gottman’s decades of observational research took the question further, examining what happens after the initial spark of closeness fades.

Gottman’s Sound Relationship House model, laid out in his book The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work, places a concept called Love Maps at its foundation: the detailed, continuously updated knowledge one partner keeps of the other’s inner world, including current stresses, ongoing hopes, and the daily texture of the other’s life, according to the Gottman Institute.

Maintenance is the twist. Couples who kept their love maps current handled conflict and stress better than couples who did not, per the Gottman Institute’s published summaries of that research.

A detailed map built during courtship goes stale without renewal, since careers shift, friendships change, and grief or ambition can quietly rewrite what a person needs from a partner year over year.

Match’s Singles in America survey, conducted with chief scientific advisor Dr. Helen Fisher and more than 5,500 respondents, found that singles who chose an unfamiliar cuisine for a first date were 170% more likely to get a second date than those who played it safe with familiar food. Yet about three-quarters of singles still opted for familiar dishes on a first outing.

A later wave of the same annual survey, fielded among 5,000 singles in 2018, found that 67% of respondents said being asked questions on a first date left a positive impression, outpacing nearly every other tactic tested apart from a direct compliment.

The overlap is not incidental. Willingness to try an unfamiliar dish and willingness to ask an unscripted question draw on the same underlying comfort with the unknown that Kashdan’s lab measures under the label curiosity.

None of this promises a wedding, and Aron’s original paper makes it clear that the 36 questions were built to generate closeness in a lab, not necessarily love. But the throughline across four decades of separate research groups, from Stony Brook to George Mason to the Gottman Institute, keeps landing on the same mechanism. Two people stay close for the same reason they got close in the first place: one of them asked and meant it.

Other Posts You May Like

• 7 Signs Your Partner Feels More Like a Roommate Than a Romantic Match and Why It Could Actually Be a Good Thing
• 7 Things That Feel Like “Falling Out of Love” but May Actually Mean Your Relationship Is Changing

If you like what you just read, then subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on social media.