4 of the Worst V8 Engines in Automotive History
The V8 engine has long been a symbol of American muscle, power, and performance. With eight cylinders working in unison to provide incredible horsepower, these engines have powered some of the most iconic vehicles in automotive history.
However, not all V8 engines have lived up to their lofty expectations. While many V8s have become legends for their raw power and engineering excellence, others have failed miserably, leaving a trail of disappointment and frustration for drivers and manufacturers alike.
Below, we explore four of the worst V8 engines ever produced, highlighting their shortcomings and why they’ve gone down in history as some of the most infamous failures in automotive engineering.
Pontiac 301 Turbo

The Pontiac 301 Turbo was introduced in 1981 as an attempt to revive Pontiac’s muscle car lineage, but instead of reigniting excitement, it left car enthusiasts disappointed. Pontiac was hoping to bring the benefits of turbocharging to its 301 V8 engine, but the result was far from impressive. The turbocharged version of the 301 produced just 210 horsepower, barely edging out the non-turbocharged 400 V8 that produced 220 horsepower.
The issue with the 301 Turbo wasn’t just the lackluster performance, it was also plagued by turbo lag, poor reliability, and overheating problems, making it an extremely difficult engine to live with. Its performance on the road failed to impress, and despite the turbocharged appeal, the 301 Turbo simply couldn’t compete with more established competitors in the sports car world. As a result, the 301 Turbo became a footnote in Pontiac’s history, a failed attempt to innovate that left car buyers underwhelmed.
Triumph Stag 2.5L V8

The Triumph Stag was a British roadster that, on the surface, seemed to be a worthy competitor to the likes of the Jaguar E-Type and Aston Martin DB5. Launched in 1970, the Stag was designed as a luxurious yet sporty vehicle that combined British engineering with the power of a V8 engine. However, its engine, intended to be a 2.5L V8, was one of the most notorious failures in automotive history.
The Stag’s V8 engine was a frankenstein’s monster of two Triumph four-cylinder engines bolted together, and it was prone to overheating. What’s worse, it had horrendous reliability issues, including frequent head gasket failures and oil leaks. Initially designed to meet the American market’s clean-burning standards, the engine’s switch to carburetors instead of fuel injection only worsened its performance. The car’s quality control was also severely lacking, making it difficult for Triumph to fix its problematic V8. Ultimately, the Stag became a disaster for Triumph, and its V8 remains one of the worst ever made, putting the brand’s reputation at risk.
Maserati AM585 3.2L
The Maserati AM585 3.2L V8 was an over-engineered marvel designed to deliver impressive power in cars like the 3200 GT, Shamal, and Quattroporte IV. On paper, it was a high-performance engine capable of producing between 365 to 400 horsepower. However, the AM585’s fame is more tied to its reputation as a finicky, high-maintenance engine than its raw performance.
Maserati’s AM585 engine was derived from Ferrari’s 3.8L V8, but it became infamous for its lack of reliability and complex maintenance needs. While it was capable of producing high horsepower, its tendency to break down frequently made it a nightmare for owners and mechanics alike.
Finding replacement parts was often difficult and expensive, and the engine’s overall durability left much to be desired. Despite its exotic appeal, the Maserati AM585 V8 is remembered for its high cost of ownership and constant repair needs, making it one of the most frustrating luxury V8 engines of its time.
Chevrolet 305 V8
The Chevrolet 305 V8 is a prime example of an engine with massive potential, but ultimately underperformed in every way possible. Released in the late 1970s, the 305 was a scaled-down version of the more powerful 350 V8. While it was a mass-market engine used in many Chevrolet cars throughout the 1980s, it simply failed to deliver the performance that people expected from a V8 engine.
The 305 was initially touted as an option for those looking for more fuel efficiency without sacrificing too much power. However, it came with significant drawbacks: it was underpowered, heavy, and less efficient than anticipated. In its best iteration, the 305 produced a modest 215 horsepower, a far cry from the performance capabilities of the 350 V8 it was derived from.
In many cases, the engine was found in work vans, station wagons, and even sports cars in the 1980s, but it lacked the muscle and excitement typically associated with V8 engines. For many enthusiasts, the 305 was a reminder of the Malaise Era, when emissions regulations and rising fuel costs led to weaker, uninspired engines.
Conclusion
The history of the V8 engine is one of innovation, passion, and failure. While some V8 engines have gone on to become icons of automotive performance, others have faded into obscurity, remembered more for their flaws than their strengths.
The engines mentioned above serve as reminders that even in the world of high-performance engineering, success is never guaranteed. Despite these failures, the legacy of the V8 engine remains strong, a testament to the unyielding pursuit of power and perfection in the automotive industry.
